Carbon insetting is a sustainable practice aimed at reducing carbon emissions by investing in projects within a company's own supply chain or operations. Unlike carbon offsetting, which involves purchasing carbon credits from external projects to compensate for emissions, carbon insetting focuses on directly addressing and reducing emissions across scopes 1, 2 & 3.
Insetting projects typically involve implementing renewable energy systems, improving energy efficiency, or adopting sustainable practices. By investing in these projects, companies not only reduce their carbon footprint but also contribute to the development of local communities, increasing the efficiency of supply chains and promoting environmental stewardship.
Carbon offsetting, on the other hand, involves compensating for carbon emissions by funding external projects that reduce greenhouse gas emissions elsewhere. These projects can include initiatives like reforestation, renewable energy projects, or methane capture from landfills. Companies purchase carbon credits equivalent to their emissions, effectively offsetting their carbon footprint.
Carbon offsetting has gained popularity as a means for companies to achieve carbon neutrality or reduce their net emissions. While it provides an avenue for companies to take responsibility for their carbon emissions, it does not directly address or reduce emissions at the source like carbon insetting.
The main distinction between carbon insetting and carbon offsetting lies in the approach to carbon reduction. Carbon insetting focuses on internal projects within a company's own supply chain or operations, while carbon offsetting relies on external projects. The World Economic Forum describes insetting as focusing on “doing more good rather than doing less bad within one’s value chain”.
With carbon insetting, companies have more control over the projects they invest in and can directly measure the impact on their emissions. They can implement sustainable practices that not only reduce their carbon footprint but also align with their business objectives. This approach allows companies to build a more sustainable and resilient supply chain while reducing their environmental impact.
In contrast, carbon offsetting provides companies with the option to compensate for their emissions by supporting external projects. While these projects can have a positive impact on reducing global emissions, they may not directly align with a company's core values or supply chain. Additionally, the verification and transparency of carbon offset projects can vary, making it crucial for companies to choose reputable and certified projects.
While carbon offsetting has its merits, carbon insetting offers several advantages that make it a more important and sustainable approach to carbon reduction.
While carbon offsetting has its place in the overall carbon reduction landscape, carbon insetting offers a more impactful and sustainable approach. By focusing on internal projects within a company's own supply chain or operations, carbon insetting provides companies with the opportunity to directly reduce their emissions, promote long-term sustainability, support local communities, and align carbon reduction efforts with their business objectives through a carbon reduction assessment. As we strive for a low-carbon future, it is crucial for companies to prioritise carbon insetting as a means to effectively combat climate change and create a more sustainable world.